Heather Brooke On Bed With Friend

NEW YEAR ... things you've seen before!!

Dear friends and dear friends, we are already
2010. After the elapsed time was right to consider whether or not to continue to monitor the problem of the sale of housing-which means continuing to fight against the excessive power of the Administration - and after taking note of the way through the parliamentary proceedings act of Defense (I did not, however, no reasonable doubt), I decided that we can not give up for the arrogance of power!
Then start again. Recent events
see (I omit what happened in 2009 - a back and forth by the State Council), the two Ministerial Decrees - Rules for the Implementation of Law 244/2007 and DM still stuck at the fourth annual Defence Committee that will give own opinion.
The Rules.
E 'an act of illegality stuffed Rapporteur highlighted by Mr De Angelis.
1 st Place "Defining housing ASI" The defense, despite the above clarification provided Cossiga from the Hon Secretary in the Defence Committee that they respected the law, has now changed its position and contrary to the provisions of the Act sought to change the definition ASI repeating that housing is "the one assigned to the staff that requires the constant presence in places of employment. " Of what we had already spoken in the past.
2 nd Place "People housing alienation." The defense insists on not wanting to deposit the list of accommodation, saying that it will at a later time (90 days. After the publication of the Regulations), although it has established with the annual DM will be disposed of 3,131 dwellings. Why
its 3131? and will therefore be inferred that it knows the properties that are no longer useful to their needs. What then the hidden reason for not wanting to say what are these units?
The manager with responsibility for dealing with the problem had twice reserve to respond to specific requests made by 'Mr Villecco Calipari and the Speaker Hon De Angelis.
The Commission's opinion will be given in the next session even if in the meantime someone else has started to break down that sense of confidence that pervaded the Defence.
The V of the House Budget Committee that would give its opinion on the rules and forwarded to the Defense Committee, has established "The condition for a favorable opinion, that the definition of" accommodation ASI "is that required by law 244/2007, art. 2, paragraph 628, letter a) No 1.
I want to mention here that in the past, the defense was forced to withdraw an annual DM because, as established by the Cons. State, the opinion expressed by the Commission shall be deemed only favorable all'avverarsi of the obligations put forward in condition.
So what? To hear from you soon