Dear friends and dear friends, we finally understood the game
House law. At first we thought that the cancellation law House wanted by the law 326/2003 - to be clear that he did buy the house for sine titulo with a discount of 41% - were attributable to the fact that some users, perhaps only one, not wanted to buy a house and wanted to stay during his lifetime, preferably for free.
We were wrong. From the chart published by Casa law and intervening with Gen. Camporini - CSM-defense, we discovered that the reason why House has made clear the law is the law that "he wanted the defense MUGGING 4500 housing." And those who were waiting to buy?
not care about that then the military would proceed with evictions. The fact remains that someone will house nine years always right remains in engaged.
makes me laugh is the fact that home straight, almost passively, suggests the staff to run and do the ISEE.
Evidently I must say that House did not read the law of the threatening letter SM - all the same and photocopy for the three-MS.
no law currently in force has given the defense the right to ask the family income of each user as it did not grant the right to do lists for the evictions is that the increase of fees. We're back to the Super enalotto. Must House know that the right of a rent increase will be equal for all, otherwise the Court of Auditors shall quote the defense to give the Treasury. Then reassure Mr. Boncioli: he will have his bell'aumento and, incidentally, from 1 January next year.
This is the answer that will give the defense: it must respect the law.
As I got to say: WHO'S 'GUILT OF ITS BAD ... ..
soon
0 comments:
Post a Comment